Historically present | |
Currently present | |
Currently not detected |
Goal: Protect pallid bat diurnal, nocturnal, and maternity roosts from destruction and human disturbance and enhance foraging habitat within commuting distance of nocturnal and maternity roosts to increase resilience to environmental and demographic stochasticity, maintain genetic diversity, and improve chances of persistence over the long-term (>100 years).
Management units: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
In 2017-2018, finalize the results of research begun in 2015 on pallid bats to identify nocturnal, diurnal, and maternity roosts, foraging areas, and water sources associated with roosts in order to identify seasonal and annual changes in use and important foraging areas, and monitor reproductive status. Collect habitat covariates associated with roosting and foraging habitat, assess threats to bats at all preserves where they occur, and develop management recommendations.
Action | Statement | Action status | Projects |
---|---|---|---|
RES-1 | Submit project metadata, survey data, and report with management recommendations to the MSP web portal. | in progress |
Criteria | Deadline year |
---|---|
Pallid Bat Surveys and Reports Completed in 2017. | 2021 |
Threat Name | Threat Code |
---|---|
Altered hydrology | ALTHYD |
Human uses of the Preserves | HUMUSE |
Urban development | URBDEV |
Management units: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Beginning in 2017, inspect the vicinity of pallid bat roosts on an annual basis (see occurrence table), taking care not to disturb bats, and use a regional monitoring protocol to collect covariate data on human activities and other threats to determine management needs.
Action | Statement | Action status | Projects |
---|---|---|---|
IMP-1 | Conduct regional IMG monitoring protocol surveys to quantify signs of human activity near occupied or potential roosts and to identify other potential threats. Care should be taken to avoid disturbing roosting bats. | available for implementation | Pallid Bat Surveys - Sweetwater Marsh |
IMP-2 | Based upon threat evaluation, determine if routine management or more intensive management is warranted. | available for implementation | Pallid Bat Surveys - Sweetwater Marsh |
IMP-3 | Submit monitoring data and management recommendations to MSP web portal | available for implementation | Pallid Bat Surveys - Sweetwater Marsh |
Criteria | Deadline year |
---|---|
Annual IMG monitoring of Pallid bat completed | 2021 |
Threat Name | Threat Code |
---|---|
Human uses of the Preserves | HUMUSE |
Urban development | URBDEV |
Management units: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Beginning in 2017, conduct routine management actions identified through the IMG regional protocol monitoring, including protecting occurrences from disturbance through fencing, signage, and enforcement.
Action | Statement | Action status | Projects |
---|---|---|---|
IMP-1 | Perform routine management activities such as protecting occurrences from disturbance through fencing, signage, and enforcement. | available for implementation | |
IMP-2 | Submit project metadata and management data to the MSP web portal. | available for implementation |
Criteria | Deadline year |
---|---|
Routine Management Completed as Needed Based Upon Monitoring Recommendations | 2021 |
Threat Name | Threat Code |
---|---|
Human uses of the Preserves | HUMUSE |
Urban development | URBDEV |
Management units: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
In 2018-2019, prepare a management plan for pallid bat that prioritizes management actions to protect roosts from disturbance, ensures sufficient roosts for seasonal temperature requirements and for reproduction, and enhances foraging habitat using data from annual roost monitoring and recommendations from the pallid bat research study.
Action | Statement | Action status | Projects |
---|---|---|---|
PRP-1 | Prioritize management actions, focusing on reducing threats and expanding occurrences in areas most likely to remain viable over the long-term in the context of future land development. | available for implementation | Pallid Bat Surveys - Sweetwater Marsh |
PRP-2 | Develop a management plan for pallid bat that prioritizes management actions for the next five years. | waiting for precedent action | Pallid Bat Surveys - Sweetwater Marsh |
PRP-3 | Identify areas where pallid bat and Townsend?s big-eared bat management can be complimentary. | waiting for precedent action | Pallid Bat Surveys - Sweetwater Marsh |
PRP-4 | Submit management plan to MSP web portal | waiting for precedent action | Pallid Bat Surveys - Sweetwater Marsh |
Criteria | Deadline year |
---|---|
Management Plan for Pallid bat prepared by 2018 | 2021 |
Threat Name | Threat Code |
---|---|
Altered hydrology | ALTHYD |
Human uses of the Preserves | HUMUSE |
Urban development | URBDEV |
Management units: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Beginning in 2020, implement highest priority management actions for pallid bats on Conserved Lands.
Action | Statement | Action status | Projects |
---|---|---|---|
IMP-1 | Management actions to be determined by the implementation plan. | waiting for precedent action | |
IMP-2 | Submit project data and management actions to MSP web portal | waiting for precedent action |
Criteria | Deadline year |
---|---|
Management actions implemented for Pallid bat | 2021 |
Threat Name | Threat Code |
---|---|
Altered hydrology | ALTHYD |
Human uses of the Preserves | HUMUSE |
Urban development | URBDEV |
Management units: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Beginning in 2020, monitor the effectiveness of management actions implemented for pallid bats on Conserved Lands.
Action | Statement | Action status | Projects |
---|---|---|---|
IMP-1 | Submit monitoring data and reports to MSP web portal | waiting for precedent action |
Criteria | Deadline year |
---|---|
Effectiveness of Implementing Pallid Bat High Priority Actions Determined | 2021 |
Threat Name | Threat Code |
---|---|
Altered hydrology | ALTHYD |
Human uses of the Preserves | HUMUSE |
Urban development | URBDEV |
Metric | Condition | Trend | Confidence |
---|---|---|---|
1. Species RichnessPercent of sites with a richness score greater than 7 |
Good |
Unknown |
Low |
2. Pallid and Townsend's big-eared bat detectionsPercent of sites with a pallid bat and/or a Townsend's big-eared bat detections |
Caution |
Unknown |
Low |
Bat Community Monitoring 2002-2019
We compiled bat survey data from sampling sites throughout San Diego County in southern California from 2002-2019. Survey methods included ANABAT bat detectors, the unaided ear, day roost surveys and exit counts, and night roost surveys. All surveys were led by or included D. Stokes. Surveys were conducted with permission from private landowners and public land managers in areas where species were historically known or had the potential to occur based on habitat preferences. The study area in which surveys were conducted, San Diego County, spans a wide array of habitat types, including woodland, forest, coastal sage scrub, chaparral, and desert habitats, and apart from the desert, is generally characterized by a moderate Mediterranean climate. Elevation across San Diego County ranges from sea level along the coast to nearly 2,000 m in the mountains.
|
Bat Management in San Diego County
This is a planned 2-year Study. In 2015 and 2016, the SDNHM, under contract to USGS, will survey areas with known pallid and Townsend's big-eared bat occurrences in MUs 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8 as identified in the MSP and in other high potential sites based on previous survey work by USGS and the SDNHM, including areas in North County and potentially areas adjacent to the MSP.
|
El Monte Preserve Bat Hotel
The goal of this project is to aid the recovery of locally declining bat species, by: 1) Creating a thermally stable, long-term (i.e., 50-75 years) roost site, or bat hotel, on the El Monte Preserve; 2) Creating replicable building plans for the "bat hotel" so it can be used as a prototype on other conserved lands; and 3) Engaging and educating the public about the ecological importance and conservation value of bats, both online and through in-person educational events.
Both the Townsend's big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii) and pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus), California Species of Special Concern, were observed within 3.5 miles of the El Monte Preserve during 2017 bat surveys conducted at El Monte County Park. De Boer Engineering will build the roosting structure in close coordination with Drew Stokes, Wildlife Biologist and local bat expert for the San Diego Natural History Museum. Together, de Boer Engineering and Mr. Stokes designed the structure to be long lasting, low maintenance, and cost efficient. We envision the "bat hotel" as a prototype for additional structures to be constructed on suitable preserves throughout the MSCP Plan Area, thereby contributing to a long-term recovery strategy for this taxon on a landscape scale.
This project is fully funded by SANDAG TransNet EMP Land Management Grant #S1125486
|
Pallid Bat Surveys - Sweetwater Marsh
The Living Coast Discovery Center, in partnership with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Cabrillo National Monument, and the San Diego National History Museum will conduct surveys to determine bat species composition on and around the Sweetwater Marsh Unit of the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge. The primary goals of this project are to establish permanent survey locations within Sweetwater Marsh, to contribute to the data collection in regional bat studies, and to establish site-specific bat habitat threat reduction and management plan based on the survey results. Strong historical research suggests that the pallid bat is likely utilizing Sweetwater Marsh for foraging and roosting at this time, This project will enable the Living Coast to contribute to larger regional conservation efforts, working with USFWS to improve the management of Sweetwater Marsh to mitigate environmental threats to the pallid bat, and contribute to the general public's greater awareness of local MSP species in San Diego. Funding this program will significantly leverage SANDAG's conservation efforts by awardee- The San Diego National History Museum- funded by Environmental Mitigation Program funds.
|
SR 94 Wildlife Infrastructure Plan
Proposed road improvements to SR 94 provide an opportunity to mitigate the potential barrier effects of the highway. This project identifies where improvements to existing infrastructure on SR-94 could improve connectivity across the South County preserves, using Best Management Practices from the scientific literature; recommends wildlife movement monitoring to identify where new crossings are needed; and identifies where additional conservation would enhance the integrity of South County linkages. The review prioritizes infrastructure improvements of 35 existing undercrossings inspected by wildlife experts in the field along 14.6 miles of SR-94 where the highway bisects conserved lands. The majority of the recommendations for infrastructure improvement focus on increasing the diameter, and thus the openness ratio (cross-sectional area divided by length), of the undercrossing itself, removing vegetation and debris blocking the undercrossing, restoring habitat in the approach to the undercrossing, and installing fencing to both (1) keep animals off the highway and (2) funnel wildlife to the undercrossings.
|
File name | Lead Author | Year | Type |
---|---|---|---|
Bat communities of Rancho Jamul Ecological Reserve and Santa Ysabel Open Space Preserve before and after 2003 wildfires | Rochester, Carlton; Backlin, Adam R.; Stokes, Drew; Mitrovich, Milan; Brehme, Cheryl; Fisher, Robert N. | 2010 | report |
Bat Hotel Building Plans.pdf | DeBoer, Jim | 2024 | fact sheet |
Bat Management in San Diego County | Myers, Brian; Stokes, Drew; Preston, Kris; Fisher, Robert N.; Vandergast, Amy | 2022 | powerpoint presentation |
DRAFT Final report for focused pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus) and Townsend's big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii) surveys in San Diego County, California | 2018 | report | |
Final Report - EDI 2024.docx.pdf | Earth Discovery Institute | 2024 | report |
Pallid Bat: Final Report | 2018 | report | |
Quantification of threats to bats at localized spatial scales for conservation and management | Myers, Brian; Stokes, Drew; Preston, Kris; Fisher, Robert N.; Vandergast, Amy | 2024 | journal article |
Recording - May 2022 SDMMP Management and Monitoring Coordination Meeting | Fisher, Robert N.; Vandergast, Amy; Myers, Brian | 2022 | recording |
State of the Regional Preserve System in Western San Diego County | Preston, Kris; Perkins, Emily; Brown, Chris; McCutcheon, Sarah; Bernabe, Annabelle; Luciani, Emilie; Kus, Barbara; Wynn, Susan | 2022 | report |
Ranges throughout western North America, from British Columbia's southern interior, south to Queretaro and Jalisco, and east to Texas [1]. Common throughout arid deserts and grasslands in the southwestern U.S. [2]. Distribution in Washington and Oregon includes Sonoran and Transitional life zones. Occurs throughout most of California except for the high Sierra Nevada Mountains and the northwestern corner of the state [3]. Historically abundant in the coastal plains, inland valleys, and western foothills of San Diego County [4 cited from 5].
Occurrences found in Buena Vista Lagoon Ecological Reserve, Kendall Frost Marsh, Tijuana Slough National Wildlife Refuge, Tijuana River Valley Regional Park, San Diego River Park, San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Torrey Pines State Natural Reserve, Agua Hedionda-SDGE, San Elijo Lagoon Ecological Reserve, Escondido Creek Preserve, Agua Hedionda Lagoon Ecological Reserve, San Luis Rey River Park, Batiquitos Lagoon Ecological Reserve, Flood Control Channel Southern Wildlife Preserve, San Dieguito River Park, Buena Vista Lagoon Ecological Reserve, San Dieguito Lagoon, Otay Lakes Cornerstone Lands, Los Penasquitos Canyon Preserve, and Torrey Pines
SSC
Occurs in a wide variety of habitats, including grasslands, shrublands, woodlands, and forests. Most common in open, dry habitats with rocky areas for roosting [3]. A yearlong resident over most of its range, often found roosting in rural man-made structures such as barns or other infrequently used buildings [4 cited from 5]. Locally common species of low elevations in California [3].
Member of the taxonomic Order Chiroptera and Family Vespertilionidae and is currently the only member of its genus [6].
Nocturnal. Emerges late (30-60 min after sunset), with a major activity peak 90-190 min after sunset, and a second peak shortly before dawn. Brief foraging periods occur in autumn, and activity is infrequent below 2°C. Undergoes shallow torpor daily. Hibernates in winter near the summer day roost [2]. Duration of the daytime roosting period differs sharply from season to season, probably at least partly in response to day length, temperature, and insect abundance [7].
Maternity colonies form in early April, and may have a dozen to 100 individuals. Males may roost separately or in the nursery colony [3]. Mates from late October-February. Fertilization is delayed, gestation is 53-71 days. Young are born from April-July, mostly from May-June. Litter size is 1-3. Average litter is 2, but females reproducing for the first time usually have 1 young. Altricial young are weaned in 7 weeks and are observed flying in July and August. Females nurse only their own young. Females and juveniles forage together after weaning. Females mate in first autumn, males in second. Maximum recorded longevity is 9 yr,1 mo [8].
Takes a wide variety of insects and arachnids, including beetles, orthopterans, homopterans, moths, spiders, scorpions, solpugids, and Jerusalem crickets. It is able to consume large, hard-shelled prey [9]. Foraging is concentrated in two periods at the beginning and end of the nocturnal cycle of activity during most of the active season [2]. Occurs over open ground, usually 0.5-2.5 m above ground level. Flight is slow and maneuverable with frequent dips, swoops, and short glides. Many prey are taken on the ground. Gleaning frequently used and a few prey are taken aerially. Can maneuver well on the ground. May carry large prey to a perch or night roost for consumption. Uses echolocation for obstacle avoidance; possibly utilizes prey-produced sounds while foraging [3]. Usually found foraging in oak savannah-type habitats, grassy oak and sycamore-lined river terraces, native grasslands, and sparsely vegetated scrublands [4 cited from 5].
Forages 0.5-2.5 km (1-3 mi) from day roost. Capable of homing from distances of a few miles, but not further [3].
Threatened by damage and destruction of roosts and hibernacula through vandalism, mine closures and reclamation, recreational activities such as rock climbing, and forestry practices such as timber harvest. Roosts and hibernicula are also threatened when man-made structures are occupied, demolished, modified, have chemical treatments applied, or when bats are intentionally eradicated and excluded. Other threats include loss or modification of foraging habitat due to prescribed fire, urban development, agricultural expansion, and/or pesticide use [1;10].
[1] Sherwin, R. 2005. Pallid Bat. Western Bat Working Group. Available from: http://wbwg.org/western-bat-species/. Accessed September 20 2016.
[2] Hermanson, J. W., and T. J. O’Shea. 1983. Antrozous pallidus. Mammalian Species Archive 213: 1-8.
[3] Harris, J. Pallid Bat. Zeiner, D.C., W.F.Laudenslayer, Jr., K.E. Mayer, and M. White, eds. 1988-1990. California's Wildlife. Vol. I-III. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California.
[4] Krutzsch, P. H. 1948. Ecological study of the bats of San Diego County, California. PhD diss., University of California.
[5] Stokes, D. C., C. S. Brehme, S. A. Hathaway, and R. N. Fisher. 2005. Bat inventory of the San Diego County Multiple Species Conservation Program Area. US Geological Survey.
[6] Yolo Conservation Plan, Species Accounts: Pallid Bat. 2009 (April). Available from: http://www.yoloconservationplan.org/yolo_pdfs/speciesaccounts/mammals/pallid-bat.pdf. Accessed September 20, 2016.
[7] Vaughan, T. A., and T. J. O'Shea. 1976. Roosting ecology of the pallid bat, Antrozous pallidus. Journal of Mammalogy 57, no. 1: 19-42.
[8] Cockrum, E. L. 1973. Additional longevity records for American bats. Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science 8, no. 3: 108-110.
[9] Freeman, P. W. 1981. Correspondence of food habits and morphology in insectivorous bats. Journal of Mammalogy 62, no. 1: 166-173.
[10] Miner, K. L. and D. C. Stokes. 2005. Bats in the south coast ecoregion: status, conservation issues, and research needs. US Forest Service.